Legal Opinion

United States v. Omar Arreguin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 22, 2013No. 16-1333PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

After the district court denied Omar Ar-reguin’s motion to suppress the fruits of a home search, he entered a conditional guilty plea to charges under 21 U.S.C. § 841, and reserved his right to appeal the district court’s ruling. We heard his appeal and affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings. United States v. Arreguin, 453 Fed.Appx. 678 (9th Cir.2011). On remand, the district court once again denied the suppression motion, and Arreguin again appeals. We reverse, remand, and instruct the district court to grant the motion.

I.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Todd FriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Aracely Marinelarena v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Almonte-NunezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  5. Lastine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API