Legal Opinion

AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 6, 2016No. 15-1645PPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAHL, Circuit Judge.

Defendants, who violated a preliminary injunction, appealed the resulting civil contempt order entered by the district court. The contempt order included a civil arrest warrant and an escalating fines provision. Defendants persisted in their defiance as the unpaid coercive fines continued to accumulate. We affirmed the contempt order and remanded “only to direct the district court to amend the sanction order so that the fines cease to accrue at some total amount.” AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG (Biolitec II), 780 F.3d 420, 428 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Brian GustafsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
  2. United States v. Gary PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  4. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Almonte-NunezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API