Legal Opinion

United States v. Todd Fries

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 2015No. 13-10116PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Todd Russell Fries (Fries) challenges his convictions for using a chemical weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 229(a) and making false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Fries contends that Congress exceeded its authority when it passed 18 U.S.C. § 229(a) to criminally enforce provisions of the Chemical Weapons Convention. Relatedly, Fries asserts that the district court erred in rejecting his proffered jury instruction on the jurisdictional requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 229(a).

Fries also maintains…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Bond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Robert ManningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Daniel ChovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Cesar UbaldoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Steven Ingram v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Rafael Miranda v. Daron WyattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Todd FriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. State v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API