United States v. Todd Fries
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Todd Russell Fries (Fries) challenges his convictions for using a chemical weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 229(a) and making false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Fries contends that Congress exceeded its authority when it passed 18 U.S.C. § 229(a) to criminally enforce provisions of the Chemical Weapons Convention. Relatedly, Fries asserts that the district court erred in rejecting his proffered jury instruction on the jurisdictional requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 229(a).
Fries also maintains…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Bond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Robert ManningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Daniel ChovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Cesar UbaldoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Steven Ingram v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Rafael Miranda v. Daron WyattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Todd FriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- State v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.