In re Linkedin User Privacy Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Katie Szpyrka (“Szpyrka”) and Khalilah Wright (“Wright”), collectively “Plaintiffs,” bring this putative class action against Defendant Linkedln- Corporation (“Defendant” or “Linkedln”). Presently before the Court is Linkedln’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Consolidated Complaint (the “FAC”). Having reviewed the parties’ papers and after having heard oral arguments of counsel, the Court has determined that Linkedln’s Motion will be GRANTED.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Randolph Wilkins, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. St. Louis Housing Authority, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Perkins v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Opperman v. Path, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In re Iphone Application LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.