Legal Opinion
In re Iphone Application Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 25, 2013No. Case No.: 11-MD-02250-LHKPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1007ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and a putative class, bring this action against Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) for alleged violations of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1750, et seq., and California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code §§ 17200, et seq. Before the Court is Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (“Mot.”) ECF No. 231. Plaintiffs oppose the Motion, (“Opp’n”) ECF No. 266, and Apple replies, (“Reply”) ECF No. 273. The Court held a hearing…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Perkins v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Opperman v. Path, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Holt v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Wilson v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Sud v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.