Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Linkedin Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 12, 2014No. Case No.: 13-CV-04303-LHKPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge

Paul Perkins, Pennie Sempell, Ann Brandwein, Erin Eggers, Clare Connaugh-ton, Jake Kushner, Natalie Richstone, Nicole Crosby, and Leslie Wall, on behalf of themselves and a putative class (“Plaintiffs”), bring the instant action against Linkedln Corporation (“Defendant” or “Linkedln”). See ECF No. 7. The gravamen of Plaintiffs’ complaint is that Defendant, the operator of a popular social networking website, violated several state and federal laws by harvesting…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In re Yahoo Mail LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Terraza v. Safeway Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  3. Lesnik v. Eisenmann SEDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Ott v. Mortgage Investors Corp. of Ohio, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  5. Rollins v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API