Opperman v. Path, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Re: ECF Nos. 393, 394, 395, 396
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL CASES
I. Background... 1029
A. The App Store... 1031
B. The Subject Apps... 1032
C. Apple’s Representations... 1034
II. Legal Standards... 1034
III. Apple’s Motion to Dismiss... 1036
A. Article III Standing.. .1036
B. Communications Decency Act... 1042
C. Misrepresentation Claims... 1045
D. California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act... 1053
E. Strict Products Liability: Design Defect and Failure to Warn... 1054
F.…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- In re Vizio, Inc., Consumer Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- NovelPoster v. Javitch Canfield GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Campbell v. Facebook Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- NovelPoster v. Javitch Canfield GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.