Legal Opinion

Opperman v. Path, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 14, 2014No. Case No. 13-cv-00453-JSTPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Re: ECF Nos. 393, 394, 395, 396

JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL CASES

I. Background... 1029

A. The App Store... 1031

B. The Subject Apps... 1032

C. Apple’s Representations... 1034

II. Legal Standards... 1034

III. Apple’s Motion to Dismiss... 1036

A. Article III Standing.. .1036

B. Communications Decency Act... 1042

C. Misrepresentation Claims... 1045

D. California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act... 1053

E. Strict Products Liability: Design Defect and Failure to Warn... 1054

F.…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. In re Vizio, Inc., Consumer Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  3. NovelPoster v. Javitch Canfield GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Campbell v. Facebook Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. NovelPoster v. Javitch Canfield GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API