Legal Opinion

Mann v. . Mann

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1918PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Special PROCEEDINGS, tried before Bond, J., on 10 July, 1918, upon a motion to amend tbe judgment of tbe court therein. Tbe object of tbe original proceeding was to establish a drainage district composed of tbe lands covered by tbe waters of Mattamuskeet Lake and those lands within two miles of its shores, under tbe Laws of 1909, chapters 442 and 509. Tbe clerk of tbe Superior Court appointed a board of viewers, and thereafter such proceedings were bad as were authorized by…

Read the full summary

Special PROCEEDINGS, tried before Bond, J., on 10 July, 1918, upon a motion to amend tbe judgment of tbe court therein. Tbe object of tbe original proceeding was to establish a drainage district composed of tbe lands covered by tbe waters of Mattamuskeet Lake and those lands within two miles of its shores, under tbe Laws of 1909, chapters 442 and 509. Tbe clerk of tbe Superior Court appointed a board of viewers, and thereafter such proceedings were bad as were authorized by the statutes. Exceptions were filed.by many of tbe parties, wbieb were heard and considered by the court, and finally…

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, C. J., concurs; ALLEN, J., dissents; BROWN, J., concurs in the dissenting opinion. The object of the original proceeding was to establish a drainage district composed of the lands covered by the waters of Mattamuskeet Lake and those lands within two miles of its shores, under the Laws of 1909, chapters 442 and 509. The clerk of the Superior Court appointed a board of viewers, and thereafter such proceedings were had as were authorized by the statutes. Exceptions were filed by many of the parties, which were heard and considered by the court, and finally the district was established by…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. President of the Bank of the United States v. MossSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  5. Heath v. New York Building Loan Banking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Clark v. . HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API