Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Cannon v. . Cannon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 15, 1943PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1ConcurrenceStacy, C. J.
WINBORNE and DENNY, JJ., join in concurring opinion. This action was brought to have the Court construe the last will and testament of Mary E. Cannon, who died a resident of Cabarrus County, North Carolina, May 4, 1938. The will consists of an original, declared and published 22 June, 1923; a first codicil, made and published 5 January, 1927; and a second codicil, made and published 21 May, 1937. It is the interpretation of the second codicil with which the case is concerned. This codicil revoked substantial provisions of the original will and set up a new scheme of testamentary disposition…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Tarkington v. Printing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.