Legal Opinion

United States v. Duncan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 9, 2001No. 00-2013, 00-2014PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

Section 3553(e) of Title 18 of the United States Code and § 5K1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) empower district courts, upon a government motion, to impose a sentence below the statutory mandatory minimum and Guidelines minimum sentences, respectively, to reflect a defendant’s “substantial assistance in the investigation or prosecution of another person who has committed an offense.” 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e); United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”), § 5K1.1, p.s. (Nov. 1998). 1 In this case, the government refused to file a substantial…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. In Re David L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Maestas v. State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Rivas-MaciasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Antwand Deshion HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API