Legal Opinion
United States v. Antwand Deshion Hawkins
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 14, 2001No. 00-1337PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
I. Introduction
This is a criminal case. Defendant-Appellant, Antwand DeShion Hawkins (Hawkins), appeals from his conviction and sentence entered under a plea agreement, specifically claiming that the district court erred in failing to require the Plaintiff-Appellee, the United States of America (the government), to move for a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 based on Hawkins’s substantial assistance. Because the law of this Circuit as set forth most recently in United States v. Moore, 225 F.3d 637 (6th Cir.2000), provides that the government’s refusal to file a motion for…
3Cases cited37 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Steven GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Martin LewisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Scott Lukse, Also Known as Scott Luxley (00-6054) Joshua Hight (00-6077)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Larico Lamar SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Reginald D. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.