Perkins v. Perkins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
On 14 October, 1949, plaintiff instituted action for alimony without divorce, and for an allowance for subsistence and counsel fees pendente lite, under G.S. 50-16. The summons was returned by the sheriff with the notation “defendant not to be found in Mecklenburg County.” On 29 October, following, the plaintiff had another summons issued labeled "alias summons,” but subsequently this was dismissed by order of court as ineffective. However, by amendment to her complaint and affidavits setting forth that the defendant had abandoned her and left the State, and that he owned real property in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hatch v. Alamance Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Hatch v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Holloway v. . HollowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- McFetters v. . McFettersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Lambeth v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Porter v. CITIZENS BANK OF WARRENTON, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Hinnant v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.