Legal Opinion

Hatch v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1922PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, C. J., dissenting; STACY, J., concurs in the dissenting opinion.

APPEAL by defendant from Daniels, J., at September Term, (619) 1921, of ALAMANCE. Plaintiff brought suit against the Piedmont Power Light Company and the Alamance Railway Company to recover damages for the alleged negligent death of her intestate. The Alamance Railway Company operates an interurban street car line connecting Burlington, Graham, and Haw River, and the Piedmont Company owns a plant in which electricity is generated for running the cars. The intestate, in January, 1918, was in the employ of the Alamance…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Settlemier v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Amy v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Bernhardt v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Kibbe v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Randleman Manufacturing Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Love v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. In re K.J.L.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API