Legal Opinion

McFetters v. . McFetters

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1941PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'W’iNBORNE, J.

Defendant, appellant, in brief filed on this appeal, states that he does not ask the review of any finding of fact in the judgment of the lower court, but challenges the right and the power of the court to render the judgment. Upon the findings of fact appearing in the judgment the challenge is untenable.

The statute, C. S., 1667, as amended by chapter 123, Public Laws 1921, and by chapter 52, Public Laws 1923, under which this action is instituted, authorizes an independent action in which two remedies are provided :

“If any husband shall separate himself from his wife and fail…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Pettigrew v. . McCoinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Fogartie v. FogartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Stadiem v. StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API