Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Murphy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1964No. 389PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Johnston, J., July 19, 1963, Session of FORSYTE.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action for subsistence and support for minor children.

The action was commenced 23 May 1963 by issuance of summons which was returned 28 May 1963 by the sheriff of Forsyth County endorsed, “After due -and 'diligent search and inquiry Deleon Timothy Murphy, Jr., is not .to be found in Forsyth County, N. C., whereabouts unknown.”

The 'complaint in substance alleges: Plaintiff and defendant were married in December 1952, .and are residents of Forsyth County, North Carolina. Three children, -ages now 8, 5 .and 3, were -born to this union. Plaintiff and defendant were separated 7 May 1962…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goodyear v. GoodyearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Dellinger v. BollingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re the Custody of SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Barnes v. KochharCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Teague v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Haarhuis v. CheekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API