Township of Merritt v. Harp
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Bay; Connine, J., presiding. Bill by the township of Merritt against William Harp, drain commissioner of Tuscola county, and Francis Dawson and William Findlay, highway commissioners of Gil-ford and Denmark townships, respectively, in said county, to restrain the flooding of complainant’s highways. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
The defendants have appealed from the decree entered in this cause, which requires them to fill up certain drains in the townships of Denmark and Gilford, which were constructed and have been maintained by and under the authority of the township drain commissioners of said townships and the county-drain commissioner of Tuscola county.
The complainant township is the southeast corner township of Bay county. Adjoining it on the east is the township of Gilford in Tuscola county. Adjoining the complainant township on the south is the township of Blumfield in Saginaw county, and adjoining Blumfield…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Township of Swan Creek v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Davis v. Township of FrankenlustMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Cranson v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Township of Merritt v. HarpMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Bruggink v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peacock v. StinchcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Cobinco v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Laraway v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Smafield v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1908