Legal Opinion

Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Beardsley Land & Investment Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1929No. Civil No. 2851PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

This is an appeal by the Roosevelt Irrigation District from a judgment for the defendants, Beardsley Land and Investment Company and Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1, entered upon the refusal of the plaintiff to amend further after a general demurrer to its first amended complaint had been sustained.

It appears from this complaint that in 1927 the defendants, for the purpose of conveying water to and applying it upon a large acreage of land located in Maricopa county, Arizona, particularly upon townships 2 and 3 north, range 2 west, constructed and are now…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Barkley v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Cass v. DicksWashington Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. KoerberArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProebstelArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Roosevelt Irrigation DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Diedrich v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API