Legal Opinion

American Fork Irr. Co. v. Linke

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1951No. 7626PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a Utah County District Court judgment which reversed a State Engineer’s order denying plaintiff’s application for a change of use as to 1000 acre feet of already appropriated direct flow irrigation water, from an early season use, to storage in a proposed dam for later use in irrgating more valuable later season crops. Defendants attack the judgment on the grounds: 1) that the Engineer’s findings and decision, being those of a trained expert, should not be disturbed; 2) that a review of his findings and decision should be confined to the issues and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Daughters of Utah PioneersUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Whitmore v. Murray CityUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Eardley v. TerryUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Tanner v. Bacon, State EngineerUtah Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Searle v. Milburn Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Wayman v. Murray City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Provo Bench Canal and Irrigation Co. v. LinkeUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Estate of Steed Ex Rel. Kazan v. New Escalante Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API