Estate of Steed Ex Rel. Kazan v. New Escalante Irrigation Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:
Plaintiff Mary Kazan, the administratrix for the Estate of Paul Steed (hereinafter Steed), sought a decree compelling defendant New Escalante Irrigation Company to replace the amount of runoff and seepage water that Steed lost when New Escalante changed its method of water application. The trial court declined to grant the decree, and Steed appeals. We are called upon to determine the law applicable when the use of new technology impacts long-established patterns of water use.
I. FACTS
This case involves the use of water in Alvey Wash, which is south of the town of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Garns v. RollinsUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- McNaughton v. EatonUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Smithfield West Bench Irr. Co. v. Union Central Life Ins.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Montana v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Badger v. Brooklyn Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Rights to the Use of WaterUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Uintah BasinUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Rocky Ford v. Kents LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.