Hamilton v. Stekoll Petroleum Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
The appeal is from a “take nothing” judgment entered in favor of defendant Company upon its motion for summary judgment in an action begun by plaintiffs H. H. Hamilton and J. R. Rich to recover contractual liquidated damages for alleged breach of a written contract; which writing provided for a farm-out to Stekoll of a portion of the oil and gas leasehold acreage to be acquired by Plamilton and Rich under contract with named landowners in consideration of Stekoll’s assumption of obligation to drill test wells on the acreage to be leased.
The order appealed from having a basis in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Peckham v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Taylor v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- McElroy v. DancigerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Lingeman v. ShirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stekoll Petroleum Co. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Calder v. Third Judicial District CourtUtah Supreme Court · 1954