Legal Opinion

Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. Harrold

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1900No. Sac. No. 613PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, C.

On December 7, 1894, the defendants, N. S. Harrold and H. W. Cowell, made to plaintiff their joint and several promissory note for the sum of fifty-six thousand six hundred and eighty-two dollars, and to secure payment thereof Harrold executed "to plaintiff a mortgage of certain lands, his individual property, and for the same purpose Cowell also made to the plaintiff a mortgage of lands owned by him in severalty. Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose said mortgages, and joined as a party defendant, among other persons, the appellant McKee, alleging that McKee claims an interest…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hall v. ArnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Mascarel v. RaffourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. Buellton Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Brown v. LuddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Murphy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API