Legal Opinion

Charles Hironymous v. Dr. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 23, 1986No. 85-2195PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Charles Hironymous appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action against Dr. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary”). Hiro-nymous sought a writ of mandamus to compel the Secretary to pay him Supplemental Security Income benefits. The district court found that it had subject matter jurisdiction over Hironymous’s action, but dismissed it on the merits. We find that because Hironymous failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the action. We therefore vacate the district…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Willis v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. Willis v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Cassim v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Cassim v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Cervantez v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API