Legal Opinion

Cervantez v. Sullivan

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 8, 1989No. CIV. S-89-529 LKK/EMPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KARLTON, Chief Judge.

This action for declaratory and injunctive relief challenges the validity of 20 C.F.R. § 416.1123(b)(2). Under that regulation, the Department of Health and Human Services counts as income, money that has been garnished from Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) applicants or recipients, when calculating entitlement to SSI benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1381-1383C.

The matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the plaintiff’s motions for class certification and for…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  2. Mid Valley Bank v. North Valley BankDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1991
  3. Wilkerson v. ButlerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
  4. Sullivan Ex Rel. Sullivan v. Vallejo City Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1990
  5. Del Puerto Water District v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API