Legal Opinion

State v. Scally

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 13, 1988No. M 695718; CA A45879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He argues that the court erred in admitting testimony, under OEC 803(5), from the arresting police officer. We affirm.

At trial, the officer testified to circumstances surrounding the stop and the arrest of defendant. He had no present recollection of several questions that he had asked or of the answers that defendant had given. However, that information was contained in the police report that the officer had prepared shortly after the arrest. The court allowed him to read the pertinent portion of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LeClairCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EdmondsOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. RumlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API