Legal Opinion

State v. Rumler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 13, 2005No. D0205484T; A123556PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

The state appeals from an order suppressing, inter alia, the results of an Intoxilyzer test in a prosecution for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. The trial court concluded that the state had failed to establish a sufficient foundation for admissibility under ORS 813.160(l)(b) because, at the time of the suppression hearing, the officer who had administered the Intoxilyzer test had no present recollection of administering that test. The trial court so concluded, notwithstanding that the state had proffered the contents of an Intoxilyzer checklist, which the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. DoernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Williams-WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Spirit Partners, LP v. Stoel Rives LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. BOARDMASTER CORPORATION v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API