Legal Opinion

State v. Townsend

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 21, 2018No. A162452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

*921Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a Schedule I controlled substance. On appeal, he challenges the trial court's ruling permitting an officer, who had no memory of his encounter with defendant, to testify from portions of his written report over the objection of defense counsel, asserting that the portions of the written report read at trial were inadmissible hearsay under OEC 803(8) and that their admission violated defendant's right to confrontation under both the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 11, of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. Romo-CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API