State v. Edmonds
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.
*754**412Under Oregon's rules of evidence, hearsay-that is, an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in or by the statement-is generally inadmissible. OEC 802 ("Hearsay is not admissible except as provided in ORS 40.450 to 40.475 or as otherwise provided by law."). That rule reflects a preference for testimony that is given in-court, under oath, and subject to cross-examination. However, the legislature has adopted specific exceptions to the prohibition on hearsay evidence. Any hearsay that is to be admitted must satisfy one of those exceptions. The question…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. FaschingOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. Guzman/HecklerOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. IseliOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. BowmanOregon Supreme Court · 2025
- Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Assn. v. ChinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.