Legal Opinion

State v. Edmonds

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2019No. CC CR1400136 (SC S065355)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

*754**412Under Oregon's rules of evidence, hearsay-that is, an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in or by the statement-is generally inadmissible. OEC 802 ("Hearsay is not admissible except as provided in ORS 40.450 to 40.475 or as otherwise provided by law."). That rule reflects a preference for testimony that is given in-court, under oath, and subject to cross-examination. However, the legislature has adopted specific exceptions to the prohibition on hearsay evidence. Any hearsay that is to be admitted must satisfy one of those exceptions. The question…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. FaschingOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. Guzman/HecklerOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. IseliOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. BowmanOregon Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Assn. v. ChinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API