Baker v. Herman Mutual Insurance

Appellant Herman Mutual raises these issues on this appeal:(1) Did the trial court err in directing a verdict in favor of Moland Brothers and Carriers and in dismissing appellant’s cross complaint for contribution?(2) Did the trial court err in failing to find plaintiff Ronald Baker negligent as a matter of law?(3) Should appellant be granted a new trial in the interest of justice?

Direction of Verdict.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of Moland Brothers and Carriers because the jury could reasonably infer from the evidence that Brown was negligent…