Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Rural Mutual Casualty Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

A host driving a car in which his guest is riding is, in law, required to exercise such skill and judgment as he possesses in the management of the car with relation to the laws of the road and the exercise of ordinary care for the safety of his guest. “A guest takes the host as he finds him, so far as skill and judgment are concerned, but he is entitled to assume upon entering the car that the host will obey the laws of the road.” Olson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. (1947), 252 Wis. 37, 40, 30 N. W. (2d) 196. See Poneitowcki v. Harres (1930), 200 Wis. 504, 509, 228 N. W. 126. It has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poneitowcki v. HarresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Harter v. DickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Goehmann v. National Biscuit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Rudolph v. KetterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Olson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frey v. DickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Paddock v. SchuelkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Dostal v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Saxby v. CadigenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Frey v. DickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API