Legal Opinion

Nels E. Nelson, Inc. v. Tarman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1958No. Civ. 17338PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Defendant Tarman appeals from a judgment against him and defendant Van Vleck in favor of nine plaintiff-materialmen for separate amounts totalling $13,585.24 and in favor of cross-complainant Burt for $3,550 as damages in lieu of specific performance of a contract for the sale of a house. *

Questions Presented

1. Was the pleading of joint venture eliminated by the “amended and supplemental complaint?”

2. Is the finding of joint venture supported ?

3. Is the finding of joint venture one of fact?

4. Did the court fail to find on a material issue?

5. Alleged error in refusing to permit defendant…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Lasry v. LedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. City of Sacramento v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Johnson v. American Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Smalley v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API