Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fracasse v. Brent

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1972No. L. A. 29876Published

1DissentSullivan, J.

I dissent.

We are confronted here with two questions: First, whether an attorney at law who has been discharged without cause by his client may bring a declaratory relief action to obtain a determination of his rights under a written contingency fee contract; and second, what may be the extent of his recovery under such circumstances.

The majority hold (1) that the action for declaratory relief is premature because the amount of any possible award cannot be determined before disposition of the client’s underlying claim; and (2) that the client’s discharge of the attorney without cause does not…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Mandell and Wright v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1969

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API