Mandell and Wright v. Thomas
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McGEE, Justice.
Enola M. Thomas filed suit to rescind a contingent fee contract employing the law partnership of Mandell & Wright to prosecute the claim arising out of the death of her husband. Mrs. Thomas alternatively sought a judgment declaring the contract null and void or that Mandell & Wright be limited to a recovery in quantum meruit for services performed prior to the notification of discharge. Mandell & Wright also sought a declaratory judgment that the contract vested them with a one-third interest in any cause of action for the death of Joseph Thomas and a one-third interest in the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. CushingSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lindgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. BrazzilTexas Supreme Court · 1888
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- In the Interest of B.L.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- General Chemical Corp. v. De La LastraTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Hoover Slovacek LLP v. WaltonTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Virginia O. Kinsel, as Attorney-In-Fact for J. Frank Kinsel, J. Frank Kinsel, Jr., Carole K. Edwards, and Catherine K. Collins v. Jane O. Lindsey, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the Lesey B. Kinsel Trust, Robert N. Oliver, Keith Branyon and Jackson Walker, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Harris County v. DowlearnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.