Steely v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judgb Thomas
— Affirming.
Section 1960 of Baldwin’s 1936 Revision of Car roll’s Kentucky Statutes, makes it unlawful for anyone with or without compensation to set up, carry on, keep, manage, operate or conduct, or assist therein “a keno bank, faro bank or other machine or contrivance used in betting whereby money or other thing may be won or lost,” etc. Section 1967 of the same Statutes prescribes that “Whoever shall suffer or permit any game or table, bank, machine, or contrivance, mentioned or included in Section 1960 of this chapter, to be set up, conducted, kept or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Moberly v. DeskinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Harvie v. Heise, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Painter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Manchester v. MarvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gayer v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Dew-Becker v. WuIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Vaughan v. DowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.