Harvie v. Heise, Sheriff
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Stabler.
In these nine separate proceedings, instituted in the original jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioners seek writs of injunction to restrain and prohibit the respondents — and in some of the actions, all law-enforcement officers, state, county, and municipal — from seizing and confiscating certain slot or vending machines. With some differences to be noted with respect to one of the machines involved in the Keeney case, these machines are all of the same make or practically alike in operation. As the several proceedings present…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Moberly v. DeskinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- State v. GooginSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Cain v. DalySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Tonahill v. MolonySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Brockett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Dussault v. KilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Couch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Alexander v. Martin, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Manchester v. MarvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.