Gayer v. Whelan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
■ MARKS, J.-—This
This is an appeal from a judgment ordering the return to plaintiff of fourteen pin ball machines which defendant, in his capacity as District Attorney of San Diego County, had seized and proposed to destroy under the provisions of section 335a of the Penal Code.
The parties agree that the findings are supported by the evidence and fairly present the issue raised on this appeal. Therefore we will look to the findings for a brief summary of the facts.
Plaintiff owned fourteen pin ball machines which were placed in various business houses in the city of Escondido for operation by…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ex parte McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Pacific Coast Dairy v. Police CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. HallnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Robertson v. Health Net of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- State v. One Bally Coney Island No. 21011 Gaming TableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Estate of BurnisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.