Painter v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Painter was charged by indictment with unlawfully keeping and exhibiting a gaming device, a slot machine, at which persons played and gambled for checks and chips of value. Judgment of conviction imposed upon him a fine of ten dollars, from which he has appealed in error.
The single question presented is whether the machine in question is a gaming device, within the prohibition of the statute, section 6805 of Shannon's Code (all editions). The section provides: "If any person encourage or promote, aid or assist, the playing at any game, or the making of any bet or wager, for money or other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rankin v. Mills Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Gaither v. CateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Manchester v. MarvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- State v. Mint Vending MacHine No. 195084Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
- State v. McTeerTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Barber v. Jefferson County Racing Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Alexander v. Martin, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.