Legal Opinion

Painter v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1932PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter was charged by indictment with unlawfully keeping and exhibiting a gaming device, a slot machine, at which persons played and gambled for checks and chips of value. Judgment of conviction imposed upon him a fine of ten dollars, from which he has appealed in error.

The single question presented is whether the machine in question is a gaming device, within the prohibition of the statute, section 6805 of Shannon's Code (all editions). The section provides: "If any person encourage or promote, aid or assist, the playing at any game, or the making of any bet or wager, for money or other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rankin v. Mills Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Gaither v. CateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Manchester v. MarvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. State v. Mint Vending MacHine No. 195084Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  5. State v. McTeerTennessee Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. Barber v. Jefferson County Racing Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. Alexander v. Martin, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API