Annod Corp. v. Hamilton & Samuels
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
Plaintiff landlord sued the individual partners in a defunct law firm for rent due and owing under a commercial lease. The landlord sought damages for fraudulent conveyance, asserting the partners had drained the law firm of its assets by taking partnership draws instead of paying rent. The partners collectively filed three motions for summary judgment, each of which was granted. The landlord appeals from the subsequently entered summary judgment in favor of the partners. It contends summary judgment was improper because there were triable issues of material fact as to whether…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Guthrey v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Lyons v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wolkowitz v. Beverly (In Re Beverly)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Clark v. Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze HsuDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Yuzon v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Chao Chen YangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.