Legal Opinion

Clark v. Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 2008No. A115399, A115445, A115474, A116164, A116901PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARGULIES, J.

This toxic tort lawsuit by 32 plaintiffs went to a jury trial against defendants the State of California (the State), Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Union Pacific), and Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. (OCLI). The trial was marked by repeated objections, sustained by the court, that plaintiffs’ attorneys were violating its in limine orders. Ultimately, after warning the attorneys that they were risking a mistrial and exposing themselves to substantial sanctions, the court declared a mistrial based on their cumulative misconduct.

Following the mistrial, the trial…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. KiserTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund v. City of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Victory Consultants, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v. VirgaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API