Wolkowitz v. Beverly (In Re Beverly)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The bankruptcy planning dispute presented in these related appeals requires us to transit waters made turbulent by cross-currents of exemptions, fraudulent transfer, denial of discharge, and divorce. We publish to dispel the myth that the toleration of bankruptcy planning for some purposes insulates such planning from all adverse consequences — it does not. In matters of bankruptcy and insolvency planning, supposed safe harbors from one danger are exposed to dangers from other quarters and may, in any event, be too small to shelter large capital transactions.
Here…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Begier v. Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,524 in Re Cloyd W. Devers and Barbara Devers, Debtors. Cloyd W. Devers and Barbara Devers v. Bank of Sheridan, MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Oney v. Weinberg (In Re Wienberg)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In re: Doron Ezra Nava Tomer EzraUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Beverly v. WolkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Wiggains v. Reed (In re Wiggains)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Batlan v. Bledsoe (In Re Bledsoe)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.