Legal Opinion

Axion Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 25, 2007No. Nos. 03-2644C, 04-297CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FIRESTONE, Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). In this case, the plaintiff, Axion Corporation (“Axion”), has sued the United States (“government”) challenging the termination for default of its $1,313,974.20 contract to provide PS-115 batteries (“batteries” or “units”) for use in munitions. The court denied the parties’ earlier cross-motions for partial summary judgment and the government’s partial motion…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Information Systems & Networks, Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Jay Cashman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Baistar Mechanical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Martin Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Stromness Mpo, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API