Legal Opinion
Martin Construction, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 20, 2011No. 09-236CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
Plaintiff, Martin Construction, Inc. (“Martin”) from Gladstone, North Dakota brought the present action under the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2006) (current version at 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109). Martin contracted with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”) on August 30, 2007 to construct a marina in Garrison, North Dakota.1 Following more than thirteen months of attempted performance, the Corps terminated Martin’s contract for default on January 13, 2009, after the contract completion date had passed. In this action, Martin seeks…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Sol O. Schlesinger, Doing Business as Ideal Uniform Cap Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lcc-Mzt Team IV v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Rust of Kentucky, Inc. v. TMS Contracting, LLC (In Re Rust of Kentucky, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2012