Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
In this appeal, we consider whether a public entity is required to indemnify public employees for legal fees incurred in successfully defending themselves against criminal prosecutions arising from actions taken within the course and scope of their employment. We conclude that indemnification for such criminal defense costs is discretionary on the part of the public entity rather than mandatory. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in favor of the public entity.
Procedural Background
On January 29, 1992, plaintiffs and appellants, Police Officers Thomas…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Jacobus v. Krambo Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Turner v. Ass'n of American Medical CollegesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.