Legal Opinion

Matter of Struthers

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1994No. SB-93-0035-D. Disc. Comm. 90-1272, 90-1323, 90-1450, 90-1757, 90-1785, 90-1830, 90-1863, 91-0301, 91-0310, 91-0375, 91-0386, 91-0416, 91-0528, 91-0631, 91-0707, 91-0884, 91-0926, 91-0949, 91-0966, 91-0967, 91-0982, 91-1058, 91-1072, 91-1089, 91-1188, 91-1278, 91-1314 and 91-1497PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

The matter of Andrew Leeroy Struthers (“Struthers”) first came before this court on April 26,1991, when the State Bar of Arizona (the “Bar”) filed a motion seeking Struthers’ interim suspension, pending resolution of complaints against him. See Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. (hereinafter “Rule_”) 52(c)(2). We directed the superior court to conduct a hearing into those allegations. Rule 52(c)(6). Based on the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, we ordered Struthers’ interim suspension on June 13, 1991.

A hearing committee (the “Committee”) later concluded that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, TarletzArizona Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re SchollArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Matter of HorwitzArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Gametech International, Inc. v. Trend Gaming SystemsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2005
  5. In re Member of State BarArizona Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API