Legal Opinion

In re Member of State Bar

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2010No. SB-10-0036-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review in this attorney disciplinary ease to determine whether the Hearing Officer erroneously used a vicarious liability standard in finding that Petitioner Jeffrey Phillips violated Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct (“ERs”) 5.1(a) and 5.3(a), and whether the recommended suspension of six months and one day was appropriate. Although we accept the Hearing Officer’s determination that Phillips violated ERs 5.1(a) and 5.3(a), we reduce the suspension to six months.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

¶ 2 Phillips is the founder and managing attorney of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KimmelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Hawver (Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. In the Matter of Rachel R. AlexanderArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In Re AbramsArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In Re PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re Hawver (Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API