Legal Opinion
Browne v. Maxfield
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 1987No. 85-1927PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
This case presents tort and contract claims arising from employment negotiations in March 1984 between plaintiff Arthur Browne (“Browne”) and defendant ' Otis Maxfield (“Maxfield”), acting as Vice President and General Manager of Philadelphia television station WKYW (“KYW”), a station owned by defendant Westinghouse Broadcasting and Cable, Inc. (“Westinghouse”). Defendants have moved for summary judgment. For reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion shall be granted in part and denied in part.
I
In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, we must…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Carlson, David v. Arnot-Ogden Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Miller v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Temp-Way Corp. v. Continental BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Greenberg v. TomlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Verschoor v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.