Legal Opinion

Miller v. Aluminum Co. of America

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1988No. Civ. A. 84-2856PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIAMOND, District Judge.

Before us is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we will grant defendant’s motion.

Background

Plaintiff, Nancy Miller, is a former employee of defendant, Aluminum Company of America (“Alcoa”). Miller sued Alcoa for several alleged violations of federal and Pennsylvania law arising out of their employment relationship. Since both parties reside in Pennsylvania, our jurisdiction over the state claims is pendent.

From the pretrial stipulation, we cull the following undisputed outline of the relevant actors and relevant events.

In 1980,…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Tammy S. Scusa v. Nestle U.S. A. Company, Inc., Doing Business as Friskies Petcare Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Erickson v. Marsh & McLennan Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Rattigan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Thomas B. Connell v. Bank of Boston and John S. IngallsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Drinkwater v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API