Legal Opinion

Gradjelick v. Hance

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 2001No. C4-00-2161PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge

Appellants, injured in an apartment building fire, challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the building owner, arguing that the district court (1) erred by applying the wrong legal standard; (2) erred by granting summary judgment when there were genuine issues of material fact in dispute; and (3) abused its discretion by refusing to grant a continuance so appellants could complete discovery. We affirm.

FACTS

On April 25, 1999, a fire broke out in a mixed-use building in Excelsior, Minnesota. The two-story building, constructed more than 100…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gradjelick v. HanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Teska v. Potlatch Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API