State ex rel. Rossetti v. Industrial Commission

This cause presents the issue of whether the writ of mandamus was properly denied. Appellant attacks the decision of the court of appeals on four grounds.

First, appellant contends that there was no evidence upon which the commission could reasonably have relied with regard to their decision affirming the determination that appellant suffers a permanent partial disability of forty-five percent.

The evidence before the commission was comprised of three doctors’ reports. Dr. Holbrook considered relator to be permanently totally disabled. Dr. Burkhart considered relator to be temporarily totally…