Guardianship of Daniels
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
Both sets of grandparents of this infant orphan sought appointment as guardians of her person and estate. The trial court ordered appointment of the paternal grandparents, and the maternal grandparents appeal. They assert error in the failure of the trial court to make findings of fact.
In guardianship proceedings, “practice and procedure and the making and entry of orders” is governed by division 3 of the Probate Code (Prob. Code, § 1606). In proceedings under division 3 the court, in a matter tried without jury, must “sign and file its decision in writing, as provided in civil actions”…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re Estate of PendellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Treu v. KirkwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Rosland v. ConstantineauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Guardianship of PankeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Estate of McCormackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Mayfield v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969