Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1923No. 11256PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEY C-

We have examined the testimony of both plaintiff and defendant to determine whether McConnell was liable to Wallace for the $900 claimed by Wallace as commission for procuring a purchaser, ready, able, and willing to pay for the lease, and we think that the conversation between plaintiff and defendant falls far short of a contract constituting Wallace agent of McConnell to procure a purchaser for an oil and gas lease on McConnell’s land. The alleged contract was entirely verbal and consisted simply of McConnell saying that he would sell Wallace a lease on his 150 acres for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Ford v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Farmers' State Bank v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Robinson v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lavery v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Clark v. SeaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API